Airline
Latest Judgments
Total 113 Consumer Court Cases Against Airline.
CMD, INDIGO AIRLINE V/S APRAJITA RANJAN
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate ABHAYDEEP SAXENA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 102
|
Date of Filing: 20-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2017
M/S Kingfisher Airline Ltd. V/S Sri Manish Kumar Deka
Court Name: Kamrup
Appelant Advocate Md.Imran Haque
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKAMRUP,GUWAHATIComplaint Case No. CC/95/2014( Date of Filing : 15 Oct 2014 )1. Sri Manish Kumar DekaS/O- Sri Prabhat Chandra Deka, R/O- Zoo Narengi Path,Geetanagar,Guwahati-21,P.S- Geetanagar,Dist-Kamrup(M),Assam...........Complainant(s)V...
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 15-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2020
The Manager, Emirate Airline V/S Ramesh Kymal
Court Name: South Chennai
Appelant Advocate S.Natarajan and V.Yurendrakumar
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing : 23.12.2014 Date of Order : 31.05.2017DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH) 2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3PRESENT: THIRU. M.MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B. M.L., : PRESIDENT TMT. K....
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-06-2017
CONTINENTAL AIRLINE CARGO (UNITED CARGO & CONTINENTAL CARGO) & ANR. V/S UNISOURCE TRADING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VISHAL DABAS
Respondant Advocate MR. ARJUN MAHJAN & MR. ABHISHEK BIRTHRAY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 210 OF 20121. UNISOURCE TRADING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.F-62, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-I,New Delhi ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CONTINENTAL AIRLINE CARGO (UNITED CARGO & CONTINENTAL CARGO) & ANR.6-A, Imp...
Case Number: 210
|
Date of Filing: 06-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2017
Indigo Airline V/S Lt. Col T.S. Bakshi (Retd.)
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Dated :14/03/2017ORDER Sh. T.S. Bakshi, complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file afresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty t...
Case Number: 237
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2017
King Fisher Airline corporate V/S Navin Mukharji
Court Name: Rewa
Appelant Advocate D.C. Hanspalani
Respondant Advocate Suneel Pandey
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2017
DENTPLY INDIA PVT. LTD. V/S MALAYSIAN AIRLINE SYSTEMS BERHAD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. M. WADHWANI & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. DHEERAJ KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 883 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 05/09/2013 in Complaint No. 2/2002 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MALAYSIAN AIRLINE SYSTEMS BERHAD28, GOPAL DASS BHAWAN, 10TH FLOOR, BARAKHAMBA ROAD,DELHI-110001..........
Case Number: 883
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Anandamoy Bauri V/S The Authorised Person, Jet Airways Airline Co. Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Rajtilak Ghoshal, Mr. Ritobrata Banerjee
Respondant Advocate Mr. Falguni Bandhopadhyay.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/626/2016(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/05/2016 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/11/2016 of District Purulia)1. The Authorised Person, Jet Airways Airline Co. Ltd.18...
Case Number: 626
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-12-2016
SIJU PAUL V/S EMIRATES AIRLINE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANDEEP.T.GEORGE
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSALCOMMISSION, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NO.837/2012JUDGMENT DATED 02/12/2016(Appeal filed against the order in C.C No.93/2011 dt.31/072012 on the file of CDRF, Ernakulam.)PRESENT:SMT. A. RADHA : MEMBERSHRI. K. CHANDRADAS NADAR ...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
DHANRAJ KHAMTKAR V/S INDIGO AIRLINE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate D.H.LAW ASSSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-11-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Airline in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Airline ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Airline under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.