company-name-logo

Aircel

Latest Judgments

Total 137 Consumer Court Cases Against Aircel.

West Bengal

AIRCEL Customer Care V/S Manik Lal Moulik

Aircel  

Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inExecution Application No. EA/12/45( Date of Filing : 11 May 2012 )InComplaint Case No. CC/11/1051. Manik Lal MoulikC-1, Nayabad Avenue, Kolkat...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 11-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 13-04-2023

Chandigarh

Aircel Limited V/S Dr. Anju Gupta

Aircel  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Mr. Vikas Cuccria, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 593 of 2012 1. Dr. Anju GuptaD/o Sh. T.P.Gupta, R/o H.No. 491, Sector 2, Panchkula ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Aircel LimitedCompany owned Company...

Case Number: 593

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

Manager, Aircel Store V/S Damodaran.K.V.

Aircel  

Court Name: Kasaragod

Appelant Advocate A.M.Abdul Jamal

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/12/231. Damodaran.K.V.S/o.K.V.Shankaran, R/at Chalmgalam House, Ceramics Road, Theruvath, KasaragodKasaragodKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Manager, Aircel StoreLevel 4, Obran Mall, Edapally, N.H.By pass Post. Kochin.682024ErnakulamKerala2. ManagerDr...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 01-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Punjab

Aircel store V/S Sukhdeep Singh

Aircel  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate Amanpal singh Sekhon

Respondant Advocate

DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/11/5921. Sukhdeep Singhson of Binderpal singh r/o H.No.19,Namdev Nagar,Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Aircel storethe mall,Opp.Piz...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 13-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

AIRCEL LTD. & ORS. V/S BOMBAY TELEPHONE USER'S ASSOCIATION

Aircel  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. JEHANGIR GAI

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 260 OF 20101. BOMBAY TELEPHONE USER'S ASSOCIATIONHaving its R/O at: 16, Panchratna, Prof. Almeida Road,Bandra (West), Mumbai-400050. & Its Executive Office at. Room No5, Petit Muncipal High School, Waterfi...

Case Number: 260

|

Date of Filing: 15-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 17-02-2011

Meghalaya

BSNL & Aircel V/S Prashanta Hajong

Bsnl   Aircel  

Court Name: West Garo Hills

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 28-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 13-02-2015

Tamil Nadu

Aircel Ltd V/S E.V.Ramanadhan

Aircel  

Court Name: Vellore

Appelant Advocate G.Ravi

Respondant Advocate M.R.Ramanan

...

Case Number: 2

|

Date of Filing: 13-11-2002

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Tamil Nadu

Aircel Ltd., & others V/S Kalaimani

Aircel  

Court Name: Coimbatore

Appelant Advocate R.Lakshmananarayanan

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 04-09-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Tamil Nadu

Aircel Ltd V/S S.D.Soundararajan

Aircel  

Court Name: Coimbatore

Appelant Advocate Chandramohan

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 02-06-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Tamil Nadu

THE AIRCEL LTD, APARNA TOWERS V/S DR.REVATHY, W/O DR.BALAN

Aircel  

Court Name: Thoothukkudi

Appelant Advocate S.JEYALAKSHMI

Respondant Advocate K.A.THIRUMALAIAPPAN

...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 30-11-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Aircel in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Aircel ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Aircel under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.