Aircel
Latest Judgments
Total 137 Consumer Court Cases Against Aircel.
(1) The Director, AIRCEL Limited V/S B. Mohammed Aazam
Court Name: Erode
Appelant Advocate A. Mahaboob Basha
Respondant Advocate -
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-05-2015
MANAGER AIRCEL LTD. V/S 314/2014 PANDU SEN
Court Name: Ganganagar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 13-08-2015
AIRCEL MOBILE COMPANY V/S HARISH SHARMA
Court Name: Jodhpur-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDERESSL FORUM JODHPUR 2RAJASTHANComplaint Case No. CC/147/20151. HARISH SHARMAJODHPUR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. AIRCEL MOBILE COMPANYJODHPUR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. TAFFAZUL HUSAIN SAMMA PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. SMT SUNITA KACHH...
Case Number: 147
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2015
AIRCEL LIMITED V/S HARISH SHARMA
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate RANJANA SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/476/20141. HARISH SHARMA JODHPUR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. AIRCEL LIMITED JODHPUR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:JUDGES SATYA DEO TAK PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. SURENDRA SINGH CHOUHAN MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. ZUBEDA QUADRI MEMBER For the Complaina...
Case Number: 476
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2015
BRANCH MANAGER, M/S AIRCEL LTD V/S MD. FAZLUR RAHMAN
Court Name: Dibrugarh
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, DIBRUGARHComplaint Case No. CC/3/20141. MD. FAZLUR RAHMANR/O BOIRAGIMATH, NEAR F.C.I, PIN-786003...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BRANCH MANAGER, M/S AIRCEL LTDKHALIHAMARI DIBRUGARH............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Dr. NITENDRA NATH D...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 05-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2016
Case Number: 110
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Manager, Aircel LTD, Coddissis Towers , Coimbotore and 3 others. V/S C. Dhanasekaran
Court Name: Thanjavur
Appelant Advocate K. Chandramohan
Respondant Advocate ----
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMELANGA COMPLEX,NEETHI NAGAR,COURT ROAD,THANJAVURComplaint Case No. CC/54/20121. C. Dhanasekaran...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Manager, Aircel LTD, Coddissis Towers , Coimbotore and 3 others.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE M...
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 17-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Aircel Dishnet Wireless Ltd and Another V/S Arun S
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/12/4021. Arun SSree Padmanabha Transport, Vazhapally...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Aircel Dishnet Wireless Ltd and AnotherThammanam, Kochi2. Dishnet Wireless LTDAircel Stor...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Aircel office V/S Smt Hibu Yami
Court Name: Papum Pare
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPAPUM PARE DISTRICT YUPIAARUNACHAL PRADESHComplaint Case No. LMCA-131/20141. Smt Hibu Yami Itanagar...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Aircel officeItanagar............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:JUDGES Mr.Budi Habung PRESIDENTHON'B...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2016
Mr.Alex Mendes, Nodal Officer, Aircel Ltd., V/S K.C.Indresh, Proprietor, Sri Maruthi Automotives
Court Name: Kodagu
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
KODAGU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAkashvani Road Near Vartha BhavanMadikeri 571201KARNATAKA STATEPHONE 08272229852Complaint Case No. CC/27/20131. K.C.Indresh, Proprietor, Sri Maruthi AutomotivesMadikeri Road, Somwarpe, Kodagu............Complainant(s)Versus1. Mr.Al...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 02-03-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Aircel in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Aircel ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Aircel under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.