26
Latest Judgments
Total 158 Consumer Court Cases Against 26.
Tunes Mobile Hub, Stream Line Building, Anappalam Jn, Main Road, Kalpetta, Wayanad, Pin: 673121, Rep V/S Greeshma C Nair, Aged 26 Years, W/o Rajesh, Greeshmam House, Ambukuthi, Muttil (P.O), Vythiri Taluk, Wayanad
Court Name: Wayanad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION ,KALPETTAWAYANAD-673122PHONE 04936-202755Complaint Case No. CC/128/2018( Date of Filing : 08 Aug 2018 )1. Greeshma C Nair, Aged 26 Years, W/o Rajesh, Greeshmam House, Ambukuthi, Muttil (P.O), Vythiri Taluk, WayanadAmbukuthiWayanadKer...
Case Number: 128
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2019
1.Dr. Chandra Sekhara Reddy 2.Needs Blood Bank 3.The District Collector V/S Batthula Mallikarjuna Son of Venkateshwarlu, Aged 26 Years, Occ Labourer
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. S. Srinivas Rao
Respondant Advocate M/s. V. Gourisankara Rao OP1 Mr. G. Soma Sekhara Rao OP2 G.P. For state OP3
Case Number: 279
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2019
SHRI RAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED V/S MR. ANIMESH SINGH AGE 26 YEARS S/O SHRI SHESH PRATAP SINGH
Court Name: Shahdol
Appelant Advocate MR. NEELESH KUMAR SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. AKHILESH NIGAM
Case Number: 55
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2021
The Manager, V/S Amel Dev,S/o.K.Devadas,aged 26 years,Advocate,
Court Name: Kollam
Appelant Advocate Adv.C.B.SANAL KUMAR.
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumCivil Station , Kollam-691013.Complaint Case No. CC/235/2018( Date of Filing : 29 Oct 2018 )1. Amel Dev,S/o.K.Devadas,aged 26 years,Advocate,Residing at J.N.V. Quarters,E.T.C.PO,Kottarakkara Taluk, Kollam District,Pin-691531............Complainant...
Case Number: 235
|
Date of Filing: 29-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 07-06-2019
BAJAJ FINANCE CO. LTD. V/S MOH.SADIQ S/O MOH. KHALIK AGE 26 YRS
Finance Bajaj Finance Bajaj 26
Court Name: Satna
Appelant Advocate MOH. ARSHAD ANSARI
Respondant Advocate NA
Case Number: 26
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2019
WESCO UTILITY, Represented through its Chief Executive Officer, Managing Director,Burla V/S Sourav Kumar Pradhan,aged about 26 years
Court Name: Nuapada
Appelant Advocate A.K.Patra
Respondant Advocate Sri S.R.Dewangan
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMNUAPADA,ODISHAComplaint Case No. CC/12/2017( Date of Filing : 23 May 2017 )1. Sourav Kumar Pradhan,aged about 26 yearsS/o-Nabin Kumar Pradhan,R/o-Radhakrushna Pada, Po/Ps/Dist-NuapadaNuapadaOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. WESCO UT...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2019
M/S RUSSIA TRACTOR AUTHORIZED DEALER MAHINDRA LIMITED V/S CHANDRESH MANDRE AGE 26 YEAR S/O HISAB MANDRE
Court Name: Balaghat
Appelant Advocate CHANDRESH MANDRE
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 30
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2019
SHRI P.P. UJJVANE PRABANDHAK PRATHMIK SEVA SAKH SAMITI MARYADIT BHORGARH V/S SARITA S/O BISRAM JI LILAHARE AGE 26 YEAR
Court Name: Balaghat
Appelant Advocate SHRI N.P. YEDE
Respondant Advocate SHRI L.R. GADVANSHI
Case Number: 67
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2019
Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. Rep. by its Manager V/S Syed Ibrahim Ali, S/o Shabir Ali, 26 years, O/c Driver
Court Name: Mahbubnagar
Appelant Advocate Sri B.Vasanth Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sri C.Rajeev Kumar
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 29-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2019
BHARAT SARKAR JARIYE MAHAPRABANDHAK P. M. RAIL MUKHYALYA V/S SMT. SNEHA MOONDARA W/O SHRI LALITA MOHATA AGE 26 YEARS
Court Name: Shahdol
Appelant Advocate MR. SUNIL SHRIVASTAVA
Respondant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA SHRIVASTAVA
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2021
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against 26 in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against 26 ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against 26 under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.